Transparency
To ensure and safeguard the originality of submissions, Grecorromana employs digital tools and anti-plagiarism software.
If generative artificial intelligence (AI) is used, authors must explicitly disclose its use, specifying the section(s) in which it was applied, as well as the nature and extent of its contribution (expressed as a percentage based on word count). To ensure transparency regarding human and AI contributions, AI may be used solely as a tool to support analysis; under no circumstances may it be treated as an autonomous agent responsible for developing the argument in whole or in part.
Under no circumstances will AI be recognized as an author, co-author, or contributor of any kind, nor will it be granted intellectual responsibility or authorship rights, whether to the system itself or to its owner.
AI may not replace the evaluation conducted by expert double-blind peer reviewers. Accordingly, the Editorial Board must assign submissions to appropriately qualified specialists based on academic expertise and subject matter.
Within this framework, reviewer reports may be subject to AI-use detection by the Editorial Board.
In light of the nature of the sources, the methodology employed, the type of analysis conducted, the individuals involved in the research, and the sources of funding, authors are encouraged to specify their respective contributions with precision, thereby promoting transparency and fair attribution. To this end, Grecorromana adopts the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy).
If no contribution statement is provided, the journal will assume that all authors contributed equally.
Authorship and Contributions
In light of the nature of the sources, the methodology employed, the type of analysis conducted, the individuals involved in the research, and the sources of funding, authors are expected to specify their respective contributions with precision, thereby promoting transparency and fair attribution. To this end, Grecorromana. Revista Chilena de Estudios Clásicosadopts the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy).
If no specification is provided, the journal will assume that all authors have contributed equally.
Authorship implies that an individual has made a substantive contribution to the work and may include participation in one or more of the following activities:
1. Conceptual and Methodological Design
Includes the formulation of the research idea, objectives, and questions, as well as the design of the methodological approach and analytical frameworks.
2. Research, Data Production, and Resources
Encompasses the collection of sources, data, or evidence, as well as their organization, curation, and preparation for analysis.
3. Analysis, Validation, and Software
Includes formal data analysis, the application of models or tools (including software), and the verification of results.
4. Writing and Manuscript Preparation
Covers the drafting of the original manuscript and the critical review, editing, and refinement of subsequent versions.
5. Project Management and Funding
Includes the acquisition of funding, project administration, and coordination of the different stages of the research.
6. Supervision and Presentation of Results
Encompasses academic oversight of the research team and the preparation of materials for presenting results, including data visualization.
Management and Attribution of Co-authorship
When more than one individual has participated in activities that qualify for authorship, it is recommended to establish clearly defined roles as well as the order in which authors will appear in the final publication. The following commonly used criteria may be applied:
1. Contribution-based order
The first author is the individual who carried out the majority of the work and drafted the manuscript. The last author is generally the principal investigator or project supervisor. Intermediate authors are listed according to their level of contribution.
2. Order based on academic hierarchy
3. Negotiated order
The order should be determined by prior agreement among the authors, in accordance with academic standards and CRediT criteria.
4. Equal co-authorship
Where contributions are equivalent, this should be indicated by a footnote marked with an asterisk (*) following the authors’ names, using a formula such as: co-first authors or joint principal authors.
5. Acknowledgement of minor contributions
Individuals who have participated in a limited capacity that does not meet the criteria for authorship under CRediT standards may be acknowledged in a footnote, marked with an asterisk (*) following the article title, or within a dedicated acknowledgements section.
